Observation (cont)
Physical responses
-
Eye movements
-
Galvanic skin responses (GSR)
-
Electro encephalograph (EEG)
-
Evoked potentials (ERP)
-
PET/CAT/fMRI
-
Habituation/High amplitude sucking
-
Infants and animals
-
Categorical perception of phonemes (Eimas et al.)
More Measures
-
Reaction time/Response time
-
Speeded judgments
-
Speeded responses (same/different)
-
Naming
-
Problem Solving Time
-
How long to solve an insight problem?
-
Reading times
-
Ratings and scales
Compare to more open-ended measures
-
Open-ended measures generate a lot of data
-
Think-aloud protocols
-
Perform some task and think aloud
-
Much like narrative methods
-
Requires data coding
-
Requires measures of inter-rater reliability
-
Allows access to hidden mental behavior
-
Relies on introspection
-
Dangerous to rely too heavily on protocols
Sampling Behavior
-
You cannot observe everything
-
What will you choose to observe
-
Need some method for sampling behavior
-
Effects of sampling
-
Influences representativeness of observations
-
Influences ecological validity
-
Influences quality of the data
Types of Sampling
-
Time sampling
-
Event sampling
NOTE: Duration, Intervals, Frequency method can be done via Time or Event sampling.
Time Sampling
-
· Select particular times to observe
-
Random times
-
Studies with beepers: How are you feeling now?
-
Fixed times
-
Diary studies: entries written at a fixed time of day
-
Strengths and weaknesses
-
May capture a range of situations
-
May miss infrequent events
Event Sampling
-
When an event is rare, time sampling may not work.
-
Event sampling
-
Observe only occurrences of a particular event
-
Observe behavior of EMTs only during accidents
-
Strengths and weaknesses
-
Focuses on events that are rare
-
Is the event easily defined?
Ways of collecting Data.
-
Observation without intervention
-
Naturalistic observation
-
Physical traces
-
Archival data
-
Observations are still theory-laden
-
Observer just does not interfere
-
Observation with intervention
-
Experimental manipulations
-
Participant observation
-
Disguised observation
-
Undisguised observation
Some Issues
-
How "ecologically valid" are the observations?
-
Jury Data
-
Interval vs Nominal scale
-
What influence does the observer have on the situation?
Naturalistic Observation
-
· Anyone can just observe
-
How is scientific observation different from nonscientific
observation?
-
Precision
-
Definition of conditions
-
· Why perform naturalistic observations?
-
Observe behavior in naturalistic settings
-
Avoid ethical problems of causing noxious conditions on purpose
-
Feral children/Children raised in isolation
-
Kitty Genovese case (stabbing)
-
Disguised Observation
-
Experimenter "infiltrates" group and observes
-
Ethical problems with disguised observation
-
Clearly there is deception here
-
Group members will treat experimenter as one of their own
-
Experimenter may (unwittingly) adopt attitudes of the
group
-
Experimenter bias and expectancy
-
May inadvertently push the group
-
Suppose the cult wanted to commit a crime?
-
Should experimenter talk them out of it?
-
Should experimenter prod them into it?
-
Can experimenter shape the behaviors of the group?
Undisguised Observation
-
Observer follows the group around
-
Following the inner working of a political campaign
-
Anthropology and cultural psychology use these methods
-
Studies of color names
-
Studies of folk botanical categories
Problems with Naturalistic Observation
-
Interesting behaviors may occur infrequently
-
Some events do not occur in public
-
Hard to examine processes during observation
-
No control over circumstances
-
Credit assignment problem
-
Experimental control
-
e.g., third variable problem
-
A correlated with B does not mean A causes B or vice versa
-
instead of A -> B, A <- C -> B
-
children in day care a lot have attachment problems
-
maybe the parents can't stand their kids
- Other examples? Rank and Age (page 23 of book).
How would you make this into a true experiment?
Directionality Problem
-
Violent Television <-> Violent Kids
Observation with intervention
-
Most psychological research involves intervention
-
Can cause infrequent events
-
Simulated emergencies
-
Investigate the limits of an ability
-
Often we try to "break" a behavior
-
Observe normally private events
Intervention allows control
-
Allows comparisons with different groups (that you create)
-
Can vary the settings explicitly
-
Can assign conditions to people
-
Eases the credit assignment problem
-
Two groups differing only in a single factor
-
Allows repeated observation of the same behavior
More controlled settings (no cult infiltration)
-
Our primary concern in this class will be experimental
settings
-
The experimenter will manipulate the world
-
We want to set up different situations that are as similar
as possible
-
We want to be able to eliminate alternative explanations
for behaviors
-
Techniques for controlled experimental studies will unfold
in the coming weeks
Example: Diffusion of Responsibility
-
Naturalistic Observation
-
Kitty Genovese case
-
Woman stabbed repeatedly
-
No bystander intervention
-
The event is both intriguing
-
Cannot know why nobody intervened here
-
Test by using a controlled experiment
Darley and Latane
-
Proposed a diffusion of responsibility explanation
-
The more people present, the less likely that one will help
-
How could this be operationalized?
-
Perceived group size (in a conversation)
-
2: Subject and "victim"
-
3: 2 Subjects and "victim"
-
6: 5 Subjects and "victim"
|
Group Size
|
% responding by end of fit
|
Time (seconds)
|
|
2
|
85
|
52
|
|
3
|
62
|
93
|
|
6
|
31
|
166
|
Experiment Lingo-Variable Types
-
Independent Variables
-
A variable that is controlled by the experiment
-
e.g., drugs a rat gets
-
levels
-
e.g., how many c.c.s of the drug
-
treatments (non-control groups)
-
Extraneous Variables
-
Not interested in them, but they could affect the results
-
e.g., Saline injection for added control
-
Dependent Variable
-
The actual measure for the stats/results
-
e.g., time to complete the maze
Internal Validity
-
Does your experiment test what it's supposed to?
-
i.e., Did changes in the independent variable cause the changes
in the dependent variable?
-
Extraneous variable (i.e., confounds) are a threat to internal
validity
-
e.g., time of day, different experimenters, etc..
Confounds (threats to internal validity)
-
history
-
multiple observations -> learning, prev items
-
maturation
-
instrumentation
-
e.g., drifting scales, poor measurement
-
statistical regression
-
selecting based on scores (see lecture 1)
-
biased selection of subjects
-
always use random assignment
-
mortality
External Validity
-
Why do I care about rats?
-
Are UT students representative?
-
Can I generalize?
-
Is there a point to my research?